Featuring the voice talents of Ed Asner, Christopher Plummer, Jordan Nagai, and Bob Peterson
Written by Bob Peterson
Directed by Pete Docter (co-director: Bob Peterson)
A painful edit to the grade has been made below...also see addition in bold below...
Unabashed and unashamed Pixar nut here. What they are able to do in terms of story and humor and animation is head-over-heels better than any other animation company working today (including my beloved Disney -- although, they're now one in the same).
I went into their newest venture, Up, with no expectations, however. The trailers never really grabbed me for some reason or another. And, it's entirely a good thing that my expectations were lowered, because, unfortunately, Up falls more towards the Cars "flawed, but still decent" end of the Pixar pantheon rather than the Wall*E "near-perfection" end.
We meet Carl Frederickson as a boy of about five and he longs to meet his favorite explorer, Charles Muntz. He dreams of one day traveling to far-off lands and just plain-old having a life full of fun expeditions. On his way home one day, he meets Ellie, a young girl his age who also has a penchant for adventure. They spark a unique friendship and through what could possibly be the most touching five minutes in a Pixar film ever, we witness in a dialogue-free, music score-only manner Carl and Ellie falling in love, getting married, making their way through the ups and downs of middle and old age, and eventually succumbing to the inevitable -- the death of a spouse. The first fifteen minutes of this film had me riveted. From Michael Giacchino's lilting score, to the top-notch animation, to the amazing caliber of storytelling without even saying a word, the Pixar folks had me onboard and loving it.
Unfortunately, they weren't able to sustain their momentum. Carl meets Russell, a cute chubby kid who simply needs to earn his last badge in Assisting the Elderly in order to become a full-fledged Wilderness Explorer. Carl's a curmudgeon and sends Russell on an impossible mission, hoping to get rid of the pesky kid. Through a series of unfortunate events, Carl decides that he's literally going to pick up his house with balloons and explore South America -- something he had promised his adventurous Ellie that they would do while they were both alive. Unbeknown to Carl, Russell has stowed away underneath his porch and came along for the ride.
And this is where the flick loses its course. It turns into part buddy comedy (of which a good chunk of the "comedy" falls flat...something very surprising for a Pixar film), part 1930s adventure serial (you know, those five/ten minute films that Spielberg mined for his Indiana Jones series). It's an admirable attempt to be sure, but neither the comedy nor the adventure can compare to the serious gravitas we've witnessed in the Carl/Ellie relationship in the film's first act. It's only when the film shifts back to this relationship that I really felt any emotional connection...which is what I expect from Pixar.
And if I'm not experiencing an emotional connection, I at least want to be laughing (see A Bug's Life as a perfect example of a non-serious Pixar film succeeding). Unfortunately, the laughs in this one seem aimed squarely at the young kids in the audience. The entire character of Dug, a dog Carl and Russell meet on their journey, fell flat for me. He was supposed to be the comedic relief, but I'm not sure I laughed at him once.
With the exception of the annoying Dug (voiced by writer and co-director Bob Peterson), the voice talent was top-notch. Ed Asner was a perfect fit for the cranky Carl. Young Jordan Nagai was able to keep Russell from turning annoying (and it was entirely possible that the character could've turned that way). Christopher Plummer was certainly pitch perfect as the villain...I just wish I could've cared for his part of the story a little more.
I realize I'm not seeming up on this film (no pun intended there), but I'd rather see lukewarm Pixar than decent Dreamworks anyday. The film looks great, sounds great (the score by the aforementioned Michael Giacchino is beautiful although slightly repetitive), and contains what may be my favorite Pixar scene ever (the sequence between Carl and Ellie mentioned above). Up is still my favorite animated film of the year at this point, although Dreamworks definitely put up valiant competition in Monsters vs. Aliens. It's just that it's not great Pixar and whenever you don't get great Pixar, you're bound to be disappointed.
Another note about 3D (this seems to be a running point of contention with me), there is nothing 3D about this film. Yes, there is depth here, but there is nothing "coming out at you." That's fine...I don't need to be grabbing for things, but I also think that if you're able to see this film simply in digital format (and not digital 3D), that'd be the way to go. I don't fault Pixar for that, but this 3D bandwagon has been something I haven't been able to jump on yet.
Edit: Unfortunately, I totally realize now that I was grading this film on some bizarre Pixar curve that doesn't apply to any other animated films. Was this movie better than Monsters vs. Aliens? Nope, not really. Better than Coraline? Unfortunately not. I'm not even sure if it's better than Cars...the lowpoint in the Pixar canon. Perhaps this will get a second viewing from me and maybe I'll appreciate it more at that point, but until that day, the B- that I originally gave this film must be changed to the more appropriate grade below. I must (try to) be fair...but please know that I'm crying on the inside...
The RyMickey Rating: C
I'm still looking forward to it very much. Since I do have a much more childish sense of humor than you. :-D
ReplyDeleteInterested to see what you think...
ReplyDeleteOkay so I saw it tonight after work.
ReplyDeleteAnd I generally rave when I see a movie I like a lot to you. So I'm not going to really go into what I really liked until I've sat on it for a bit.
But a few things:
It was incredibly well-made, music, voice acting, animation, everything.
I think if this wasn't a pixar movie you would have thought it was a much better movie than you do now.
On 3D: It seems to be a double-edged sword. If it uses the 3D as a tool to add... another demension, people whine; if it is used as a gimmick and have stuff pop out, people whine. I agree that 3D itself is just a justification to get another 3 bucks out of people, but it's here and probably here to stay, and I'd rather it be the former example, and not the latter.
Driving home, my ipod shuffled upon "When I'm Sixty-four" by the Beatles. I'm convinced that if this movie wasn't Pixar, that beginning scene that you love so much would have been set to it.
And on something you have no opinion of: The short was pretty great.
I'd love to say you're right -- that if it wasn't Pixar, I wouldn't have been so harsh on it -- but I'm not sure...
ReplyDeleteI still think, regardless of who made it, that the final two thirds of the movie cannot match up to the amazing first third.
The thing is, I went into this with ZERO expectations. Nothing about this movie was appealing to me at all. So it wasn't like it was a let down which led to my disappointment. It just was disappointing on its own.
To me, the comedy just fell flat most of the time. I really only laughed 5 or 6 times which, in what is billed as a comedy, isn't enough.
I mean, maybe you're right. If Dreamworks had put this thing out, I would've been floored by the first 30 minutes (I still was floored by the first 15 minutes). But I still think I would've been going, "Those final two acts sucked."
Things I liked:
ReplyDelete-I was going to list Ellie as a separate entity on what I liked, until I realized I really liked every character.
-Dug and Kevin. I found them both hilarious. During their consecutive introductions I don't think I stopped laughing. The wording that Dug used was so incredibly awkward and energetic, I loved it. And the dumb looks on Kevin's face whenever the camera turned to him.
-The cinematography especially the 30 second shot of Carl pulling the house behind him, while the sun as setting behind.
- The music was great.
- The general sense of humor of the movie which matched up with mine brilliantly.
What I didn't like:
-The joke with the lead dogs helium voice was stupid. Probably one of the only that fell flat for me.
-The last 10 minutes didn't match up to the rest of the movie. I'm watching it again friday, so maybe I will like it better then. Probably not.
-Thinking about it, I didn't actually care about the storyline all that much at least compared to the actual characters.
Also, the opening montage is basically Revolutionary Road without the bitterness.
ReplyDeleteWhen I read you comparing it to Rev Road, I said "no way," but you're pretty much right.
ReplyDeleteNo wonder I loved that part so much...
If only you had classed him as crochety
ReplyDeletewith a 't' in there
ReplyDeleteWell, maybe he did like to crochet...
ReplyDelete"crochety"---you've coined a new word...
crochety (kroshetee)
ReplyDeleteadj.
coming across as sweet/domestic/innocent - when in fact dangerous/mean/ill-intentioned
adv.
-chetilly
In response to the question, the person (gender neutral) gave a smile that seemed to signal heartfelt assent. Yet, she (oops) knew she would never, in fact, visit the invalid - what a crochety woman!
Origins
-from the English words crochet and machete
Look at you, Ms. English Major...pulling out all the stops there!
ReplyDelete