The Master (2012)
Starring Joaquin Phoenix, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams, and Laura Dern
Directed by Paul Thomas Anderson
Without a doubt, Paul Thomas Anderson's The Master is filled with beautiful direction and superb acting, but I can't exactly say it's overly enjoyable to watch. In and of itself, that's not a bad thing, but the film which delves into the inner workings of cults, mind control, wartime post-dramatic stress disorder, and free will (or a lack thereof) is an odd duck. While I grew fascinated with the characters, I couldn't help but notice an odd sense of detachment that runs throughout, never quite allowing me to fully enter the world that was created oscreen. For some reason, there was just some odd disconnect with the film that less than twenty-four hours removed I can't quite explain yet.
I had heard some talk that there wasn't really a narrative throughout the film, but I thought there was a fairly legitimate through-line story...although "story" isn't necessarily the driving force of the film which may be why it doesn't quite settle in comfortably while you're watching it. We meet Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix), a WWII vet who turns to booze to cope with his memories and finds that he can't quite keep the lowly jobs that have come his way upon return to the States. One night Freddie stumbles upon a party on a yacht and sneaks aboard. Upon awakening, rather than be booted off the boat, he's befriended by the man chartering it -- Lancaster Dodd. Dodd's a charming man with a charismatic personality that easily switches from introspectiveness to bombast, but it makes him a difficult man to pin down by both the audience and by Freddie. Dodd's the leader of a movement known as "The Cause" and believes strongly in the philosophies of past lives. Through psychological and sociological experiments, Dodd seems to be a manipulator of sorts and for some reason does what he can to keep Freddie firmly under his thumb. As the film slowly progresses, we see the relationship between Freddie and Dodd evolve and devolve and it certainly is the basis for any type of story we witness (however loose that story may be).
The film looks stunning. There were shots that had me in awe of their simplicity, yet enthralled by their depth, richness, and gorgeousness. And the acting is definitely top-notch, with Philip Seymour Hoffman actually impressing me a bit more than Joaquin Phoenix (the latter of whom is garnering much deserved praise for his role). While I admired both of them, Phoenix's part simply seemed a little more "actorly" and a bit more gimmicky in his mannerisms and verbalizations. I say that with great respect as Phoenix still managed to enthrall me throughout, but if I were to compare the two, Hoffman's role comes out a bit on top. I think a large part of that is due to the fact that his character is still such an enigma to me. A kind and considerate man, yet one who has great power and knows how to manipulate so easily that it's almost frightening, Hoffman as Dodd had me thoroughly intrigued every moment he was onscreen.
And yet something didn't quite click and, as I mentioned above, I'm not quite sure what didn't work. I found myself checking my watch quite often throughout the film despite loving many scenes, being fascinated by the visuals, and enamored with the two main performances. [I've left Amy Adams out of the conversation because while her role was good, I don't find it quite worthy of the unanimous effusive praise it's been receiving.] I liked the almost behind-the-scenes look at the Scientology-based group "The Cause," but the film doesn't really take a stand as to whether this religion (or any religion, for that matter) is a help or a hindrance to society as a whole. It also left me questioning why these two souls in Freddie and Lancaster mutually needed the contentious relationship in which they found themselves. On Freddie's end, it's almost understandable -- a wayward drifter who found a somewhat steady hand to feed and clothe him. But on Lancaster's side of the equation, was Freddie just a guinea pig for his attempts at strengthening his "Cause?" The question is never really answered and, unfortunately, I think it's an important enough one that an answer is deserved.
The Master is certainly an interesting movie and one that has some beautiful moments, but it's also one that probably deserves to be watched again to more fully comprehend just what Paul Thomas Anderson was trying to say. However, and perhaps rather unfortunately, it's not the type of film that you want to jump right back into to have another go.
I had heard some talk that there wasn't really a narrative throughout the film, but I thought there was a fairly legitimate through-line story...although "story" isn't necessarily the driving force of the film which may be why it doesn't quite settle in comfortably while you're watching it. We meet Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix), a WWII vet who turns to booze to cope with his memories and finds that he can't quite keep the lowly jobs that have come his way upon return to the States. One night Freddie stumbles upon a party on a yacht and sneaks aboard. Upon awakening, rather than be booted off the boat, he's befriended by the man chartering it -- Lancaster Dodd. Dodd's a charming man with a charismatic personality that easily switches from introspectiveness to bombast, but it makes him a difficult man to pin down by both the audience and by Freddie. Dodd's the leader of a movement known as "The Cause" and believes strongly in the philosophies of past lives. Through psychological and sociological experiments, Dodd seems to be a manipulator of sorts and for some reason does what he can to keep Freddie firmly under his thumb. As the film slowly progresses, we see the relationship between Freddie and Dodd evolve and devolve and it certainly is the basis for any type of story we witness (however loose that story may be).
The film looks stunning. There were shots that had me in awe of their simplicity, yet enthralled by their depth, richness, and gorgeousness. And the acting is definitely top-notch, with Philip Seymour Hoffman actually impressing me a bit more than Joaquin Phoenix (the latter of whom is garnering much deserved praise for his role). While I admired both of them, Phoenix's part simply seemed a little more "actorly" and a bit more gimmicky in his mannerisms and verbalizations. I say that with great respect as Phoenix still managed to enthrall me throughout, but if I were to compare the two, Hoffman's role comes out a bit on top. I think a large part of that is due to the fact that his character is still such an enigma to me. A kind and considerate man, yet one who has great power and knows how to manipulate so easily that it's almost frightening, Hoffman as Dodd had me thoroughly intrigued every moment he was onscreen.
And yet something didn't quite click and, as I mentioned above, I'm not quite sure what didn't work. I found myself checking my watch quite often throughout the film despite loving many scenes, being fascinated by the visuals, and enamored with the two main performances. [I've left Amy Adams out of the conversation because while her role was good, I don't find it quite worthy of the unanimous effusive praise it's been receiving.] I liked the almost behind-the-scenes look at the Scientology-based group "The Cause," but the film doesn't really take a stand as to whether this religion (or any religion, for that matter) is a help or a hindrance to society as a whole. It also left me questioning why these two souls in Freddie and Lancaster mutually needed the contentious relationship in which they found themselves. On Freddie's end, it's almost understandable -- a wayward drifter who found a somewhat steady hand to feed and clothe him. But on Lancaster's side of the equation, was Freddie just a guinea pig for his attempts at strengthening his "Cause?" The question is never really answered and, unfortunately, I think it's an important enough one that an answer is deserved.
The Master is certainly an interesting movie and one that has some beautiful moments, but it's also one that probably deserves to be watched again to more fully comprehend just what Paul Thomas Anderson was trying to say. However, and perhaps rather unfortunately, it's not the type of film that you want to jump right back into to have another go.
The RyMickey Rating: B
No comments:
Post a Comment