In Time (2011)
Starring Justin Timberlake, Amanda Seyfried, Cillian Murphy, Vincent Kartheiser, and Olivia Wilde
Directed by Andrew Niccol
In Time takes us to an Earth in which money doesn't exist, but instead time is the most precious commodity around. Here, humans are given twenty-five years of existence, but when their twenty-sixth year rolls around, they stop aging and a digital-type clock implanted into their forearm clicks on with a decreasing timeclock of one year. Everything we normally pay money for is paid for with time -- a cup of coffee, for example, takes four hours off of your clock (and your life). You're paid for labor in hours as well, so it's not as if you're absolutely dead in a year. In fact, just like our current monetary system, there are some very wealthy people with hundreds -- even thousands -- of years to go.
With such an intriguing concept, it's a shame that writer-director Andrew Niccol shifts focus halfway through the movie into an updated Bonnie and Clyde/Robin Hood reboot with Justin Timberlake as the "poor" Will Salas teaming up with the "wealthy" Sylvia Weis (Amanda Seyfried) to redistribute Sylvia's father seemingly infinite stash of time to the less fortunate. Things were going so well until we drifted down this path we'd seen before and it's unfortunate that the unique premise is watered down to something we've seen time and time again.
Surprisingly, Timberlake more than holds his own in this film. While I don't think he'll ever be mistaken for a great thespian, he definitely embodied the character and abandoned his celebrity persona. Granted, he still needs some work (one scene in which he's forced to cry just proves laughable), but overall, I think he's got some talent in the acting department. Ms. Seyfried, on the other hand, I'm not so sure about. It's not that I dislike her as an actress, but in the last few films I've seen her in she seems to be simply phoning in her performance. She doesn't bring any depth to her character here and it's a little bit disappointing, although I'm not sure whether it's her fault or the fault of the script. She's walking on thin ice at this point...her next film may make or break her for me.
Still, this is rather fun film (which also contains a nice performance from the heretofore unmentioned Cillian Murphy as a futuristic "cop" who is in search of the two "criminals") and it's worth giving it a chance. I'm sure this was a case of low expectations making something appear to be a bit more promising than it actually is, but In Time wouldn't be a waste of your time should you choose to watch it.
With such an intriguing concept, it's a shame that writer-director Andrew Niccol shifts focus halfway through the movie into an updated Bonnie and Clyde/Robin Hood reboot with Justin Timberlake as the "poor" Will Salas teaming up with the "wealthy" Sylvia Weis (Amanda Seyfried) to redistribute Sylvia's father seemingly infinite stash of time to the less fortunate. Things were going so well until we drifted down this path we'd seen before and it's unfortunate that the unique premise is watered down to something we've seen time and time again.
Surprisingly, Timberlake more than holds his own in this film. While I don't think he'll ever be mistaken for a great thespian, he definitely embodied the character and abandoned his celebrity persona. Granted, he still needs some work (one scene in which he's forced to cry just proves laughable), but overall, I think he's got some talent in the acting department. Ms. Seyfried, on the other hand, I'm not so sure about. It's not that I dislike her as an actress, but in the last few films I've seen her in she seems to be simply phoning in her performance. She doesn't bring any depth to her character here and it's a little bit disappointing, although I'm not sure whether it's her fault or the fault of the script. She's walking on thin ice at this point...her next film may make or break her for me.
Still, this is rather fun film (which also contains a nice performance from the heretofore unmentioned Cillian Murphy as a futuristic "cop" who is in search of the two "criminals") and it's worth giving it a chance. I'm sure this was a case of low expectations making something appear to be a bit more promising than it actually is, but In Time wouldn't be a waste of your time should you choose to watch it.
The RyMickey Rating: C+
I am pretty sure this movie was only made as a test of how many time puns can be fit in a single movie.
ReplyDeleteMaybe I just glossed over them, but they didn't seem that egregious to me...
ReplyDelete